O'Connor v. Young, No. 06-1800 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1800 CAROLYN E. O CONNOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM G. YOUNG, Individually and in his capacity as chief judge; MORRIS E. LASKER, as individual and in their capacity as federal employees/judges; CONRAD K. CYR, as individual and in their capacity as federal employees/judges; SANDRA L. LYNCH, as individual and in their capacity as federal employees/judges; KERMIT V. LIPEZ, as individual and in their capacity as federal employees/judges; COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS; EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Senator; JOHN KERRY, Senator, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:06-cv-00331-JRS) Submitted: November 21, 2006 Decided: November 28, 2006 Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carolyn E. O Connor, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Carolyn E. O Connor appeals the district court s order dismissing her civil action against several federal judges, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and its Senators, for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny O Connor s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See O Connor v. Young, No. 3:06-cv-00331-JRS (E.D. Va. June 22, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED - 3 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.