Lewis v. Microsoft, No. 06-1354 (4th Cir. 2007)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1354 BRENDA D. FLOWERS, LEWIS, M.A.S., J.D.; WILLIAM L. Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:05-cv-00343-H) Submitted: March 9, 2007 Decided: March 29, 2007 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brenda D. Lewis, William L. Flowers, Appellants Pro Se. Richard L. Farley, Christopher Allen Hicks, KATTEN, MUCHIN & ROSENMAN, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Timothy L. Boller, William O. Ferron, Jr., SEED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP, PLLC, Seattle, Washington, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Brenda D. Lewis, M.A.S., J.D., and William L. Flowers, Jr., appeal the district court s order granting Microsoft Corporation s motions for summary judgment and to dismiss, and denying relief in their civil action in which they alleged various claims concerning trademark infringement. record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lewis v. Microsoft Corp., No. 5:05-cv-00343-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 23, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
