Smith v. Laidlaw Transit Services, No. 06-1124 (4th Cir. 2006)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1124 BONNIE S. SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LAIDLAW TRANSIT SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:02-cv-04179-JFA) Submitted: August 24, 2006 Decided: August 28, 2006 Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bonnie S. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Franklin Grady Shuler, Jr., TURNER & PADGETT, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Bonnie S. Smith appeals the district court s order substantially accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to Defendant on Smith s federal claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), and on Smith s state law claims for negligence and harassment.* find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Laidlaw Transit Servs., No. 3:02-cv-04179-JFA (D.S.C. Jan. 6, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * The district court dismissed without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c) (2000) Smith s claim under the South Carolina Bill of Rights for Handicapped Persons. - 2 -
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
