Lora v. Hollenhorst, No. 05-7658 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7658 WILFREDO GONZALEZ LORA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THOMAS M. HOLLENHORST, Official Capacity; WILLIAM FITZPATRICK, Official Capacity; TIMOTHY MCGRATH, Official Capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-05-738-1) Submitted: July 28, 2006 Decided: August 16, 2006 Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appeals the district court s orders denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lora v. Hollenhorst, No. CA-05-738-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 5, 2005 & entered July 6, 2005; filed Aug. 1, 2005 & entered Aug. 2, 2005). We deny Lora s motion to consolidate and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.