Johnson v. Boyd, No. 05-7624 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7624 LARRY D. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FLORA BOYD, Administrator; KERSHAW COUNTY; THOMAS WILLIAMS, Assistant Administrator, Kershaw County Detention Center; STEVE MCCASKELL, Sheriff Kershaw County; LEE BOAN, City Investigator; THOMAS WILLIAMS, Chief Correctional Officer; SHERIFF DEPUTY HATHWAY; MARY ANDERSON, Correctional Officer; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ALEXANDER; MS. CLAXTON, Classification Specialist; NURSE COOK, Detention Center Medical Staff, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CA-04-23044-6-TLW) Submitted: June 15, 2006 Decided: June 19, 2006 Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. James Miller Davis, Jr., DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; Donna Seegars Givens, WOODS & GIVENS, LLP, Lexington, South Carolina; Robert Holmes Hood, HOOD LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Larry D. Johnson appeals the district court s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. CA-04-23044-6-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 1, 2005). We have reviewed Johnson v. Boyd, No. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.