Woodson v. Laury, No. 05-7596 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7596 JIMMIE HUGENE WOODSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ALEXANDER LAURY, Richmond P.D., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-05-496-2) Submitted: March 30, 2006 Decided: April 6, 2006 Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jimmie H. Woodson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Jimmie Hugene Woodson appeals the district court s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Woodson v. Laury, Nos. CA-05- 496-2; CA-05-496 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 29 & entered Sept. 30 & Oct. 25, 2005). We dispense We deny Woodson s motion for production of documents. with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.