Aziz v. Central VA Regional Jail, No. 05-7310 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7310 MUHAMMAD A. AZIZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CENTRAL VIRGINIA REGIONAL JAIL, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-04-732-7) Submitted: August 9, 2006 Decided: August 31, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Muhammad A. Aziz, Appellant Pro Se. Stanardsville, Virginia, for Appellee. Helen Eckert Phillips, Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Muhammad A. Aziz appeals the district court s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.* See Aziz v. Central Virginia Reg l Jail, No. CA-04-732-7 (W.D. Va. filed Aug. 12, 2005; entered Aug. 15, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and materials legal before contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * While Aziz attempted to amend his complaint to name two individual defendants in his objections to the magistrate judge s report, the purported amendment was proffered beyond the time permitted by the magistrate judge for Aziz to amend his complaint. Because the purported amendment was not considered by the district court, this court s affirmance is only as to the dismissal of Aziz s complaint against the Central Virginia Regional Jail. We accordingly have not considered the legal merit, if any, of Aziz s claims against any individuals who may have participated in the incidents that underlie Aziz s complaint. - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.