Andrews v. Moore, No. 05-7289 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7289 ANTHONY ANDREWS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KIMBERLY A. MOORE; WINNIE JORDAN REAVES, Defendants - Appellees, and JOHN ASHCROFT; FRANK D. WHITNEY; ROBERT BOBBY HIGDON, JR.; JOHN STUART BRUCE, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-04-174) Submitted: January 18, 2006 Decided: March 2, 2006 Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Andrews, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Anthony Andrews appeals the district court s orders denying relief on his Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), action and his motions for reconsideration pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Andrews v. Moore, No. CA-04-174 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 27, 2005 & June 28, 2005). We deny the motions for abeyance and motion to recuse. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.