US v. Jones, No. 05-7267 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7267 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SHAWN LEIGH JONES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CR-01-68) Submitted: December 22, 2005 Decided: January 3, 2006 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Shawn Leigh Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Shawn Leigh Jones, a federal prisoner, filed a petition under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2000), seeking to have his conviction and sentence vacated based on his claim of actual innocence. Though the district court construed the mandamus petition as a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), Jones clearly intended to file a mandamus petition. However, because Jones does not meet the standard for a mandamus petition, we affirm the district court s denial of relief. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987); In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). We dispense with oral contentions argument because the facts and legal are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.