Ward v. Maloney, No. 05-1994 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1994 MARK A. WARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PETER E. MALONEY, Plan Television Corporation, Administrator, LIN Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CA-05-424) Submitted: February 28, 2006 Decided: March 22, 2006 Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark A. Ward, Appellant Pro Se. William McCardell Furr, WILLCOX & SAVAGE, Norfolk, Virginia; Robert K. Taylor, PARTRIDGE, SNOW & HAHN, L.L.P., Providence, Rhode Island, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Mark A. Ward appeals the district court s order granting summary judgment to Peter E. Maloney, administrator of the LIN Broadcasting Corporation Retirement Plan, whom Ward claimed failed to produce documents pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. ยง 1024(b)(4) (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ward v. Maloney, 386 F. Supp. 2d 607 (M.D.N.C. 2005) (No. CA-05-424). We also deny Ward s motion for preparation of a transcript at the government s expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.