Wanguhu v. Gonzales, No. 05-1877 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1877 HANNIBAL NGANGA WANGUHU, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A79-513-031) Submitted: May 17, 2006 Decided: June 6, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bokwe G. Mofor, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, John W. Sippel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Hannibal Nganga Wanguhu, a native and citizen of Kenya, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying proceedings. his motion to reopen and reconsider removal We have reviewed the administrative record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Wanguhu s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (b) (2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In Re: Wanguhu, No. A79-513-031 (B.I.A. Jul. 26, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and materials legal before contentions are adequately the and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED - 2 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.