Allen v. SSA, No. 05-1646 (4th Cir. 2006)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1646 DALLICE M. ALLEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee, and KATHLEEN A. MIKA; DENISE RIDDLE; BLAKE GORDAN; SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY AND APPEALS, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (CA-04-280) Submitted: December 22, 2005 Decided: January 4, 2006 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dallice M. Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings Caughman, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Dallice Allen appeals from the district court s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her complaint in which she asserted that the Social Security Administration unlawfully suspended her benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Allen v. Social Security Admin., No. CA-04-280 (D.S.C. filed Feb. 18, 2005; entered Feb. 22, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.