Adam Murse v. Mary Murse, No. 24-1057 (3d Cir. 2024)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on March 25, 2024.
Download PDF
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 24-1057 ___________ ADAM I. MURSE, Appellant v. MARY L. MURSE ____________________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-03829) District Judge: Honorable Jeffrey L. Schmehl ____________________________________ PETITION FOR REHEARING ________________________ BEFORE: CHAGARES, Chief Judge, and JORDAN, HARDIMAN, SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, RESTREPO, BIBAS, PORTER, MATEY, PHIPPS, FREEMAN, MONTGOMERY-REEVES, CHUNG, Circuit Judges _________ The petition for rehearing filed by Appellant in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court, it is hereby ORDERED that the petition for rehearing by the panel is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to file the amended opinion and judgment contemporaneously with this order. The revisions to the opinion are at pages 2 and 4-5. The petition for rehearing filed by Appellant also having been submitted to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service and a majority of the judges of the circuit in regular service not having voted for rehearing, it is hereby ORDERED that the petition for rehearing by the Court en banc is DENIED. BY THE COURT s/ Paul B. Matey Circuit Judge Dated: April 23, 2024 Amr/cc: All counsel of record 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
