Robert Lark v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm, No. 12-9003 (3d Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 12-9003 ______________ ROBERT LARK v. SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA COUNTY; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellants _______________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (No. 2-01-cv-01252) District Judge: Honorable John R. Padova ______________ Argued: April 17, 2014 Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, SCIRICA and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges (Filed: May 6, 2014) Thomas W. Dolgenos, Esq. (ARGUED) Ronald Eisenberg, Esq. Edward F. McCann, Jr., Esq. R. Seth Williams, Esq. Three South Penn Square Philadelphia, PA 19107-3499 Counsel for Appellants Leigh M. Skipper, Esq. Stuart Lev, Esq. (ARGUED) Federal Community Defender Office Eastern District of Pennsylvania Suite 545 West The Curtis Center Philadelphia, PA 19106 Counsel for Appellee ______________ OPINION ______________ MCKEE, Chief Judge The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania appeals the order of the District Court granting Robert Lark s Petition for a writ of habeas corpus. This is the second time this case has come before us. We previously held that the District Court had not proceeded to the third step of the inquiry required under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), and remanded for the court to conduct that analysis. See Lark v. Sec y Pa. Dep t of Corr., 645 F.3d 596, 628 (3d Cir. 2011) ( Lark I ). On remand, the District Court concluded that Lark had established by a preponderance of the evidence that the Commonwealth had struck five Black potential jurors because of their race. We must now determine if the District Court s findings were clearly erroneous. Holloway v. Horn, 355 F.3d 707, 713 (3d Cir. 2004); Lark I, 645 F.3d at 606. We have explained that, relief must be granted under Batson when even one black person is excluded [from the jury] for racially motivated reasons. Holloway, 355 F.3d at 720 (internal quotation marks omitted). We have carefully considered the findings the District Court made on remand pursuant to its Third Step Batson analysis. 2 We cannot conclude that the court s conclusion that at least one of the Commonwealth s peremptory strikes was racially motivated is clearly erroneous. Accordingly, we will affirm the conditional grant of Lark s Petition for a writ of habeas corpus. 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.