Rona Johnson Adeoye v. Clayton County DFCS Employee(s), et al, No. 24-10437 (11th Cir. 2024)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
USCA11 Case: 24-10437 Document: 7-1 Date Filed: 04/02/2024 Page: 1 of 3 [DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-10437 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ RONA JOHNSON ADEOYE, Plainti -Appellant, S.A.B., et al., Plainti s, versus CLAYTON COUNTY DFCS EMPLOYEE(S), CLAYTON COUNTY JUVENILE COURT, CLAYTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT FAMILY CHILDREN SERVICES, CLAYTON COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT SECTOR 3 PRECINCT, USCA11 Case: 24-10437 2 Document: 7-1 Date Filed: 04/02/2024 Opinion of the Court Page: 2 of 3 24-10437 Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket Nos. 1:22-cv-02840-VMC, 1:22-cv-02838-VMC ____________________ Before ROSENBAUM, LUCK, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. The 30-day statutory time limit required Rona Adeoye to file a notice of appeal from the district court’s September 9, 2022 final judgment on or before October 11, 2022. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). However, Adeoye did not file a notice of appeal until February 7, 2024. Further, the record contains no basis for relief under Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6) because Adeoye did not move to extend or reopen the appeal period and more than 180 days have passed since the judgment was entered. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) (providing that a party may move to extend the time for ling a notice of appeal within 30 days of entry of nal judgment); id. R. 4(a)(6)(A) (providing that a party may move to reopen the appeal period not later than 180 days after the order or judgment is entered). Accordingly, the notice of appeal is untimely and cannot USCA11 Case: 24-10437 24-10437 Document: 7-1 Date Filed: 04/02/2024 Opinion of the Court Page: 3 of 3 3 invoke our appellate jurisdiction. See Green v. Drug Enf ’t Admin., 606 F.3d 1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 2010). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
