USA v. Todd Stephens, No. 24-10033 (11th Cir. 2024)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
USCA11 Case: 24-10033 Document: 11-1 Date Filed: 02/23/2024 Page: 1 of 3 [DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-10033 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plainti -Appellee, versus TODD STEPHENS, Defendant-Appellant, PNC MORTGAGE, a division of PNC Bank National Association, et al., Defendants. USCA11 Case: 24-10033 2 Document: 11-1 Date Filed: 02/23/2024 Opinion of the Court Page: 2 of 3 24-10033 ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 9:23-cv-80043-AHS ____________________ Before JORDAN, BRASHER, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. Todd Stephens, proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s final judgment in favor of the United States and our dismissal of his previous appeal, which also was from that judgment, for failure to pay the filing fee. The 60-day statutory time limit required Stephens to file a notice of appeal from the district court’s October 13, 2023 final judgment on or before December 12, 2023. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(b); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B). However, Stephens did not file the instant notice of appeal until January 2, 2024. Further, there is no basis in the record for relief under Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6) because Stephens did not move to extend or reopen the appeal period or indicate in his notice of appeal that he failed to receive formal notice of the entry of judgment. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)-(6). Accordingly, the notice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke our appellate jurisdiction. See Hamer v. Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of Chi., 138 S. Ct. 13, 21 (2017). USCA11 Case: 24-10033 24-10033 Document: 11-1 Date Filed: 02/23/2024 Opinion of the Court Page: 3 of 3 3 Additionally, Stephens cannot challenge our dismissal of his previous appeal via a notice of appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1294(1). He filed a motion to reinstate that appeal but did not submit the filing fee with his motion. See 11th Cir. Rule 42-1(b), 42-2(c). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
