Diana Lugo v. Birmingham Jefferson County Transit Authority, No. 23-13904 (11th Cir. 2024)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
USCA11 Case: 23-13904 Document: 12-1 Date Filed: 03/26/2024 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-13904 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ DIANA YAZMIN LUGO, Plainti -Appellant, versus BIRMINGHAM-JEFFERSON COUNTY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 2:22-cv-00362-ACA ____________________ USCA11 Case: 23-13904 2 Document: 12-1 Date Filed: 03/26/2024 Opinion of the Court Page: 2 of 2 23-13904 Before ROSENBAUM, GRANT, and LUCK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. Diana Lugo appeals from the district court’s “sanction judgment entered on October 2, 2023.” However, the court did not impose sanctions on Lugo during the October 2 hearing or at any other time. Accordingly, Lugo’s notice of appeal fails to designate an existing judgment or order, and we lack jurisdiction over her appeal. See Bogle v. Orange Cnty. Bd. Of Cnty. Comm’rs, 162 F.3d 653, 661 (11th Cir. 1998) (noting that a notice of appeal must designate an existing judgment or order, not one that is merely expected or within the appellant’s contemplation when the notice of appeal is filed); Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(1)(B). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
