Intrepid Marine Towing & Salvage, Inc., et al v. Unknown Claimants, et al, No. 23-13170 (11th Cir. 2023)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

USCA11 Case: 23-13170 Document: 22-1 Date Filed: 11/13/2023 Page: 1 of 3 [DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-13170 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ INTREPID MARINE TOWING & SALVAGE, INC., and its stockholder/s, including d.b.a Sea Tow Clearwater/Port Richey, JAMES PATRICK LAMB, as owners and/or owners pro hac vice of a 1998 World Cat 266SS, Vessel ID No., (VIN) EPY662178898, FL Reg. No. FL3588KF, including her engines, gear, tackle, appurtenances, equipment, furniture, etc., for Exoneration from and/or Limitation of Liability, Petitioners-Appellants, versus USCA11 Case: 23-13170 2 Document: 22-1 Date Filed: 11/13/2023 Opinion of the Court Page: 2 of 3 23-13170 UNKNOWN CLAIMANTS, NICHOLAS CACHUSSIE, ADRIENNE CACHUSSIE, CHERYL WATKINS, Claimants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:21-cv-00420-CEH-SPF ____________________ Before ROSENBAUM, BRANCH, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. Because Intrepid Marine Towing & Salvage, Inc., d/b/a Sea Tow Clearwater/Port Richey, and its shareholders filed a motion for reconsideration within 30 days of the district court’s December 8, 2022, final judgment, the 30-day statutory time limit required the appellants to file a notice of appeal on or before September 21, 2023, 30 days after disposition of the motion for reconsideration. USCA11 Case: 23-13170 23-13170 Document: 22-1 Date Filed: 11/13/2023 Opinion of the Court Page: 3 of 3 3 See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), (4)(A). However, the appellants did not file a notice of appeal until September 27, 2023. Accordingly, the notice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke our appellate jurisdiction. See Hamer v. Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of Chi., 138 S. Ct. 13, 21 (2017). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.