USA v. Matthias Jacob Edward Mann, No. 23-10277 (11th Cir. 2024)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

USCA11 Case: 23-10277 Document: 34-1 Date Filed: 04/26/2024 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-10277 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plainti -Appellee, versus MATTHIAS JACOB EDWARD MANN, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 5:22-cr-00010-LCB-HNJ-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 23-10277 2 Document: 34-1 Date Filed: 04/26/2024 Opinion of the Court Page: 2 of 2 23-10277 Before JORDAN, NEWSOM, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: William Bradford, appointed counsel for Matthias Mann in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Mann has filed a pro se response in which he requests the appointment of new counsel. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Mann’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED, and Mann’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.