Moms for Liberty - Brevard County, FL, et al v. Brevard Public Schools, et al, No. 22-10297 (11th Cir. 2022)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
USCA11 Case: 22-10297 Date Filed: 11/21/2022 Page: 1 of 3 [DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-10297 ____________________ MOMS FOR LIBERTY - BREVARD COUNTY, FL, AMY KNEESSY, ASHLEY HALL, KATIE DELANEY, JOSEPH CHOLEWA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus BREVARD PUBLIC SCHOOLS, MISTY HAGGARD-BELFORD, Chair, Brevard County School Board, in her official and individual capacities, MATT SUSIN, Vice Chair, Brevard County School Board, in his official and individual capacities, USCA11 Case: 22-10297 2 Date Filed: 11/21/2022 Page: 2 of 3 Opinion of the Court 22-10297 CHERYL MCDOUGALL, Member, Brevard County School Board, in her official and individual capacities, KATYE CAMPBELL, Member, Brevard County School Board, in her official and individual capacities, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 6:21-cv-01849-RBD-GJK ____________________ Before WILSON, JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges, and RUIZ, * District Judge. PER CURIAM: Plaintiffs-Appellants Moms for Liberty–Brevard County, FL and four of its members challenged as unconstitutional the Public Participation Policy utilized by Defendants-Appellees Brevard Public Schools and the individual members of its school board. * Honorable Rodolfo A. Ruiz II, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, sitting by designation. USCA11 Case: 22-10297 22-10297 Date Filed: 11/21/2022 Opinion of the Court Page: 3 of 3 3 Appellants filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction, which the district court denied. See Moms for Liberty–Brevard Cnty., FL v. Brevard Pub. Schs., 582 F. Supp. 3d 1214, 1217 (M.D. Fla. 2022). Appellants timely appealed. After review of the parties’ briefs, and with the benefit of oral argument, we find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s thorough, well-reasoned order. See Schultz v. Alabama, 42 F.4th 1298, 1311 (11th Cir. 2022) (“We review a district court’s order granting or denying a preliminary injunction for abuse of discretion.”). We therefore affirm the district court’s order denying Appellants’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction. AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
