USA v. Brian James Hulse, No. 21-10359 (11th Cir. 2022)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on August 2, 2021.
Download PDF
USCA11 Case: 22-11170 Date Filed: 09/30/2022 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-11170 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BRIAN JAMES HULSE, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00214-TFM-C-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-11170 22-10470 Date Filed: 09/30/2022 Opinion of the Court Page: 2 of 2 2 Before LUCK, LAGOA, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Domingo Soto, appointed counsel for Brian Hulse in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hulse’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
