USA v. Christopher L. Haley, No. 14-14076 (11th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 14-14076 Date Filed: 04/22/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 14-14076 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00004-BAE-GRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHRISTOPHER L. HALEY, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia ________________________ (April 22, 2015) Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Matthew K. Hube, appointed counsel for Christopher L. Haley in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and Case: 14-14076 Date Filed: 04/22/2015 Page: 2 of 2 filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). In a pro se response to counsel’s motion to withdraw, Haley requests the appointment of substitute counsel and a continuance. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Haley’s pro se motion for appointment of substitute counsel and a continuance is DENIED, and the judgment revoking Haley’s supervised release and his resulting sentence are AFFIRMED. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
