USA v. Amy Elizabeth Newby, No. 14-12881 (11th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 14-12881 Date Filed: 03/23/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 14-12881 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00248-MMH-JRK-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus AMY ELIZABETH NEWBY, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (March 23, 2015) Case: 14-12881 Date Filed: 03/23/2015 Page: 2 of 2 Before WILSON, FAY, and RIPPLE, * Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Amy Elizabeth Newby appeals her 15-month sentence, imposed within the guideline range, for committing fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341. On appeal, Newby contends that the district court’s factual findings were insufficient with respect to the loss amount for which she was held accountable, and that the district court erred when it declined to apply a mitigating role reduction. Upon review of the parties’ briefs and the relevant law, and having had the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. AFFIRMED. * Honorable Kenneth F. Ripple, Senior Circuit Judge from the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
