USA v. Oreste Rolando Chavez, No. 14-11510 (11th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on November 5, 2014.
Download PDF
Case: 14-11510 Date Filed: 05/26/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 14-11510 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 9:11-cr-80106-KAM-28 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ORESTE ROLANDO CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (May 26, 2015) Before MARTIN and ANDERSON *, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The prior opinion of the panel is vacated, and this opinion is substituted for it. * This order is being entered by a quorum pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). Case: 14-11510 Date Filed: 05/26/2015 Page: 2 of 2 Robert W. Stickney, appointed counsel for Oreste Rolando Chavez, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the defendant’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
