Mendoza v. Secretary, FL DOC, No. 13-14968 (11th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CasePetitioner, convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to death, appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The court rejected petitioner's claim that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel in the investigation and presentation of mitigation evidence during the penalty phase, and concluded that petitioner failed to show that the state court's decision was an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law or based on an unreasonable determination of the facts. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment of the district court.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.