Richard Jaimes v. Geico General Insurance Company, No. 13-11614 (11th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 13-11614 Date Filed: 10/29/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _____________ No. 13-11614 Non-Argument Calendar _____________ D. C. Docket No. 9:10-cv-80769-KAM RICHARD JAIMES, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant-Appellant. ______________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ______________ (October 29, 2013) Before DUBINA, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-11614 Date Filed: 10/29/2013 Page: 2 of 2 This appeal involves attorneys fees. Defendant-Appellant GEICO General Insurance Company s ( GEICO ) sole argument on appeal is that if the final judgment entered by the district court is vacated as requested by GEICO in appeal No. 124427, the award of attorneys fees to Appellee Richard Jaimes ( Jaimes ) should likewise be vacated. Because our court has affirmed the final judgment in appeal No. 12-14427, see Jaimes v. GEICO General Insurance Co., Nos. 12-14427 & 13-10847 (11th Cir. Aug. 15, 2013), we also affirm the district court s order awarding attorneys fees to Jaimes in the present appeal (No. 13-11614). AFFIRMED. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
