Houston v. Marod Supermarkets, Inc., No. 12-15403 (11th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CasePlaintiff filed suit against Marod to compel it to bring one of its stores into compliance with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. 12181-12189. The district court dismissed the claim, concluding that plaintiff lacked standing. The court concluded that plaintiff had standing to seek injunctive relief against defendant where plaintiff has been to the store in the past, he wants to return, and his frequent trips directly past the store render it likely that he would do so were it not for the alleged ADA violations. Accordingly, the court reversed the district court's dismissal of plaintiff's claim.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.