Untied States v. Rosales-Bruno, No. 12-15089 (11th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed his conviction for illegally reentering the United States for a second time. At issue was whether defendant's sentence, which was 60 months above the high end of defendant's revised guidelines range but 33 months below the statutory maximum of 120 months imprisonment, is substantively unreasonable. After considering and giving reasonable weight to each of the relevant 18 U.S.C. 3553(a) factors, the district court in this case imposed an upward variance sentence. The court concluded that the sentence did not exceed the outer bounds of the wide range of discretion that the district courts are afforded and, given all of the relevant facts and circumstances, the sentence is reasonable. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.