United States v. Siegelman, No. 12-14373 (11th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this CaseDefendant was found guilty of one count of federal funds bribery, four counts of honest services mail fraud, and one count of conspiracy to commit honest services mail fraud, as well as one count of obstruction of justice. The court concluded that the district court did not err in denying defendant's motion for a new trial based upon U.S. Attorney Leura Canary's alleged failure to honor her disqualification and the court affirmed the district court's order denying defendant's motion for a new trial as to that claim. The court also concluded that the district court did not commit reversible error in calculating defendant's sentence on remand. Accordingly, the court affirmed the sentence and the district court's amended final judgment sentencing him to seventy-eight-months' imprisonment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.