United States v. Elliot, No. 12-10553 (11th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed his conviction and sentence for two counts of robbery and one count of brandishing a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence. The court concluded that even if the district court erred in admitting an eyewitness's identification testimony, any such error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt. Further, the district court did not err by using defendant's Alabama youthful offender adjudication to classify him as a career offender under U.S.S.G. 4B1.1. Accordingly, the court affirmed defendant's conviction and sentence.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.