USA v. Bernard Shaw, No. 11-16097 (11th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 11-16097 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JULY 5, 2012 JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:99-cr-00125-KMM-6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BERNARD SHAW, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________ (July 5, 2012) Before CARNES, WILSON and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Gail M. Stage, on behalf of Michael Caruso, interim Federal Public Defender and appointed counsel for Bernard Shaw in this appeal from the denial of an 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) sentence reduction motion, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Shaw s § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce his sentence is AFFIRMED. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
