USA v. Michael Burgess, No. 11-15828 (11th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ No. 11-15828 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JUNE 7, 2012 JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 6:10-cr-00161-ACC-GJK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL FRANK BURGESS, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (June 7, 2012) Before HULL, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Sean M. Wagner, counsel for Michael Frank Burgess in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Burgess s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Accordingly, Burgess s motion for leave to file a pro se supplemental brief is DENIED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.