Scholz Aluminium GMBH v. Gearbulk, Inc., et al, No. 11-15501 (11th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 11-15501 Date Filed: 09/19/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 11-15501 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cv-01330-RAL-MAP SCHOLZ ALUMINIUM GMBH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEARBULK, INC., ARROW TERMINALS, INC., Defendants - Appellees. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (September 19, 2012) Before HULL, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: In this bailment action, after a bench trial the district court concluded that Case: 11-15501 Date Filed: 09/19/2012 Page: 2 of 2 the contract between Scholz Aluminum GmbH and Arrow Terminals, Inc., concerning the proper procedure for releasing aluminum billets stored at Arrow s facility was ambiguous, took parol evidence, and entered final judgment for appellees Gearbulk, Inc., and Arrow Terminals, Inc. After thorough review, we can discern no error in the district court s interpretation of the contract between the parties or the district court s findings of fact. Accordingly, we affirm. AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.