USA v. Thomas A. Iodice, No. 11-14156 (11th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ No. 11-14156 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JANUARY 26, 2012 JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 5:97-cr-00037-RS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus THOMAS A. IODICE, Defendant-Appellant. __________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _________________________ (January 26, 2012) Before EDMONDSON, HULL and BLACK, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Thomas Iodice in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Iodice s supervised release revocation and sentence are AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.