Compucredit Holdings Corporation v. Akanthos Capital Management, LLC, et al., No. 11-13254 (11th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on November 10, 2011.
Download PDF
Case: 11-13254 Date Filed: 10/19/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 11-13254 D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cv-00117-TCB COMPUCREDIT HOLDINGS CORPORATION, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus AKANTHOS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, ARIA OPPORTUNITY FUND LTD., AQR ABSOLUTE RETURN MASTER ACCOUNT, L.P., CC ARBITRAGE, LTD., CNH CA MASTER ACCOUNT, L.P., et al., Defendants - Appellees. -------------------------Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia -------------------------(October 19, 2012) ON PETITION FOR REHEARING Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, PRYOR, MARTIN, and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: Case: 11-13254 Date Filed: 10/19/2012 Page: 2 of 2 The decision of the district court is affirmed by an evenly divided court. The opinion of the panel remains vacated. United States v. Geders, 585 F.2d 1303, 1306 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc) ( [T]he court en banc is evenly divided; therefore the judgment . . . of the district court is affirmed by operation of law. );1 see id. (indicating that, if district court judgment is affirmed by operation of law, the panel opinion remains vacated); see also Reshard v. Britt, 839 F.2d 1499 (11th Cir. 1988); United States v. Sigma, Int l, Inc., 300 F.3d 1278, 1280 (11th Cir. 2002) (en banc) (noting that when panel opinions are vacated they are officially gone, and are void, and none of the statements made in them has any remaining force and cannot be considered to express the view of this Court. ). AFFIRMED. 1 In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), we adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down before October 1, 1981. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
