USA v. Millard Chaver

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 11-12499 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FEBRUARY 29, 2012 JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 9:98-cr-08047-DTKH-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lPlaintiff – Appellee, versus MILLARD CHAVERS, lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lDefendant – Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________ (February 29, 2012) Before CARNES, WILSON and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: David Joffe, appointed counsel for Millard Chavers in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 593 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Chavers’s revised total sentence is AFFIRMED. 2