USA v. Gaspar Bishop, No. 11-12462 (11th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on September 7, 2012.
Download PDF
Case: 11-12462 Date Filed: 09/10/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 11-12462 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 4:10-cr-00096-RH-WCS-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GASPAR BISHOP, a.k.a. Nigel Humphrey, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _________________________ (September 10, 2012) Before HULL, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Randolph P. Murrell, appointed counsel for Gaspar Bishop, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the Case: 11-12462 Date Filed: 09/10/2012 Page: 2 of 2 appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We have reviewed both counsel s brief and Bishop s response. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bishops s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
