Zurab Lezhava v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., et al., No. 11-10113 (11th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 11-10113 FEB 10, 2012 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY ________________________ CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:08-cv-03605-CAP ZURAB LEZHAVA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC., WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, in its capacity as the Trustee of American Home Mortgage Investment Trust 2007-1, Defendants-Appellees, JOHN DOE INVESTOR, Defendant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ________________________ (February 10, 2012) Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, and COX, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The Plaintiff, Zurab Lezhava, appeals following the district court s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendants, American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company, in its capacity as the Trustee of American Home Mortgage Investment Trust 2007-1. Lezhave contends that the district court erred in granting the Defendants summary judgment on all of his claims. Lezhava s arguments in support of this contention were rejected by the district court in a well-reasoned opinion. We agree with the district court s analysis and conclusions. (Order at Dkt. 97 at 1-20.) No reversible error has been shown. Lezhava also contends that the district court erred in denying his motion for leave to amend. We conclude that Lezhava has shown no abuse of discretion in denial of the motion for the reasons stated in the district court s order denying the motion. (Id. at 21-27.) AFFIRMED. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
