USA v. Supreme Scott, No. 10-12499 (11th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-12499 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar DECEMBER 2, 2011 ________________________ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 9:06-cr-80183-DMM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SUPREME SCOTT, a.k.a. Walter Scott, Defendant-Appellant. __________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _________________________ (December 2, 2011) Before TJOFLAT, BARKETT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Steven Kassner, counsel for Supreme Scott in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because review of the issues raised by Scott and counsel, as well as an independent review of the record as a whole, reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Scott s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
