Kevin McLaughlin v. The Krystal Company, No. 09-14709 (11th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _____________ No. 09-14709 Non-Argument Calendar _____________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT APR 30, 2010 JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 08-00611-CV-1-CG KEVIN MCLAUGHLIN, REBECCA MCLAUGHLIN, PHILLIP DUTT, MCLAUGHLIN DUTT, LLC. Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus THE KRYSTAL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama ____________ (April 30, 2010) Before BIRCH, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is based upon the district court s grant of a motion for summary judgment filed by The Krystal Company (Krystal), against Krystal licensees/franchisees, Kevin McLaughlin, Rebecca McLaughlin, Phillip Dutt and McLaughlin-Dutt, LLC (appellants). The claims alleged by appellants arose when Krystal declined to renew their license/franchise agreement. The pertinent facts are amply set forth in the Memorandum Opinion and Order of the district court dated August 14, 2009. We have thoroughly reviewed the record in this case, the briefs and the argument of counsel. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of Krystal. AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.