USA v. Ralph E. Brazel, Jr., No. 09-12979 (11th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Nov. 24, 2009 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK No. 09-12979 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 91-00300-CR-T-17-B UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RALPH E. BRAZEL, JR., Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (November 24, 2009) Before BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Leonard E. Clark, appointed counsel for Ralph Brazel, Jr., has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court s denial of § 3582(c)(2) relief is AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.