FTC v. National Urological Group, Inc., No. 09-10617 (11th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Dec. 15, 2009 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK No. 09-10617 ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 04-03294-CV-CAP-1 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, versus NATIONAL UROLOGICAL GROUP, INC., d.b.a. Warner Laboratories, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant, NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL WEIGHT LOSS, INC., Defendant-Counter-Claimant, HI-TECH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., corporations, JARED WHEAT, THOMASZ HOLDA, individually and as officers of the corporations, STEPHEN SMITH, individually and as officer of National Urological Group, Inc., and National Institute for Clinical Weight Loss, Inc., TERRILL MARK WRIGHT, M.D., individually., Defendants-Appellants, ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _________________________ (December 15, 2009) Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, BIRCH and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: After having thoroughly reviewed the record, the briefs and having heard oral argument in this case, we are of the opinion that the well-reasoned decision and the judgement of the district court should be and is AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.