USA v. Alberto Pena-Lopez, No. 08-12697 (11th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 08-12697 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ OCT 17, 2008 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK D. C. Docket No. 04-00036-CR-01-WCO-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALBERTO PENA-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _________________________ (October 17, 2008) Before ANDERSON, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Alberto Pena-Lopez challenges his sentence of 12 months of imprisonment after revocation of his supervised release. Pena-Lopez argues that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court failed to consider that he re-entered the United States illegally to support his family. We affirm. We review a sentence imposed after revocation of supervised release for reasonableness. See United States v. Sweeting, 437 F.3d 1105, 1106 07 (11th Cir. 2006). We review the reasonableness of a sentence for an abuse of discretion. Gall v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 586, 597 (2007). [T]he party who challenges the sentence bears the burden of establishing that the sentence is unreasonable in the light of both [the] record and the factors in section 3553(a). United States v. Talley, 431 F.3d 784, 788 (11th Cir. 2005). The district court did not abuse its discretion by imposing a sentence within the guideline range. Pena-Lopez entered the country illegally, which violated a term of his supervised release. The district court stated that Pena-Lopez s recidivist conduct was an act of defiance or [a] deliberate violation of the law that it found disturbing. The nature and circumstances of an offense and the history and characteristics of a defendant are relevant to fashion an appropriate sentence. See 28 U.S.C. ยงยง 3553(a), 3583(e)(3); United States v. Clay, 483 F.3d 739, 743 (11th Cir. 2007). Pena-Lopez s sentence is reasonable. AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.