S.T.W. v. Commissioner, SSA, No. 23-1081 (10th Cir. 2023)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Appellate Case: 23-1081 Document: 010110841469 Date Filed: 04/11/2023 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT _________________________________ S.T.W., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER, SSA, Page: 1 April 11, 2023 Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court No. 23-1081 (D.C. No. 1:22-CV-00722-NYW) (D. Colo.) Defendant - Appellee. _________________________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT * _________________________________ Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges. _________________________________ This matter is before us on Defendant-Appellee’s Unopposed Motion for Remand for Further Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The motion states that the Social Security Administration’s Appeals Council has further reviewed this case and determined that a remand for additional proceedings and the issuance of a new decision is appropriate. To those ends, Defendant-Appellee asks this court to vacate the district court’s judgment and remand with instructions for the district court to remand this matter to the Social Security Administration. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. * Appellate Case: 23-1081 Document: 010110841469 Date Filed: 04/11/2023 Page: 2 Upon careful consideration, the motion is GRANTED. The judgment of the district court is VACATED and this matter is REMANDED to the district court with instructions to remand this case to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Clerk’s Office shall issue the mandate forthwith. Entered for the Court, Per Curiam 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.