D.A. Osguthorpe Family Partner v. ASC Utah, Inc., et al, No. 11-4062 (10th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this Case
The issue before the Tenth Circuit in this case arose from a case that originated in Utah state court; one of the parties turned to the federal courts to ask for a stay of all state-court proceedings and an order to compel arbitration of the state-court claims. The federal district court declined to do so, dismissed the case, and awarded attorney's fees to the prevailing party. On appeal, the Tenth Circuit was petitioned to review whether the federal district court correctly determined that it should have stayed out of the "still-unfolding state-court controversy." Upon review of the matter, the Tenth Circuit concluded that the U.S. Supreme Court's "Colorado River" doctrine was the persuasive and controlling law of this case. "We think that in this case the Colorado River doctrine wisely counsels our abstention from duplicative interference with the exceptionally protracted state proceedings present here." The Court affirmed the federal district court, but vacated the award of attorney's fees. The case was remanded for detailed findings of fact to support the fee award.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.