Williams v. Hill, No. 10-7097 (10th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this Case
Plaintiff-Appellant Milton Williams appealed the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. §1983 suit. In 2008, Appellant submitted a handwritten "Request to Staff" (RTS) on a self-prepared form, complaining that his prison spending account had been frozen. Appellant filed several additional RTS forms over the ensuing weeks, claiming that his account remained frozen. Dissatisfied with the response he received from Defendant-Appellee Angela Hill of the Inmate Trust Fund, Appellant filed a grievance to the warden of the correctional facility. Concluding that Appellant's funds were subject to garnishment for outstanding fees and costs from an earlier county court proceeding, Appellant attempted to escalate the denial of his grievance to the Oklahoma Department of Corrections Administrative Review Authority, but the appeal was returned as untimely. In response, Appellant filed suit alleging that various prison and Corrections Department officials retaliated against him for exercising his First Amendment rights by improperly freezing his prison account. The district court dismissed the complaint finding that Appellant had failed to properly exhaust administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA, 42 U.S.C. §1997e(a)). On review of the record, the Tenth Circuit found that Appellant's claims were largely without merit, and that he failed to properly exhaust all available remedies through the Department of Corrections. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.