Travis v. Murphy, et al, No. 10-1144 (10th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit June 17, 2010 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT BRYAN L. TRAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. No. 10-1144 (D. Colorado) MICHAEL MURPHY; MONROE MCKAY; JOHN PORFILIO; NEIL GORSUCH, et al., (D.C. No. 1:10-CV-00240-ZLW) Defendants - Appellees. ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before HARTZ, ANDERSON, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges. Bryan L. Travis appeals the dismissal of his claims against four members of this Court based on their rulings against him. As explained by the district court, the defendants are immune from such liability. See, e.g., Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11 12 (1991). We AFFIRM the judgment below and DENY Mr. Travis s * After examining the brief and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ENTERED FOR THE COURT Harris L Hartz Circuit Judge -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.