Webb v. Vratil, et al, No. 09-3371 (10th Cir. 2010)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit April 14, 2010 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court STEWART A. WEBB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KATHRYN H. VRATIL, in her official capacity of Chief Judge for the United States District Court for the District of Kansas; and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS, No. 09-3371 (D.C. No. 2:09-CV-2603-FJG) (D. Kan.) Defendants-Appellees. ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before MURPHY, GORSUCH, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges. Stewart A. Webb filed suit against the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, and against Kathryn Vratil, in her official capacity as the Chief Judge of that court. In a thorough six-page order, the district court denied * After examining appellant s brief and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. Mr. Webb s request to proceed in forma pauperis, concluding that the lawsuit was legally frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Accordingly, the district court dismissed the case without prejudice to the filing of a pre-paid complaint. Mr. Webb appeals this decision and seeks permission to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. For substantially the same reasons set out by the district court in its order, this court concludes that this appeal is frivolous or malicious. See also Price v. Vratil, No. 09-3172, 2010 WL 558555, at *1 (10th Cir. Feb. 18, 2010) (unpublished) (reaching same result in similar appeal with similar complaint). Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this appeal and deny the request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) ( [T]he court shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines . . . the . . . appeal is frivolous or malicious. ). ENTERED FOR THE COURT Neil M. Gorsuch Circuit Judge -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
