United States vs. Bailey, No. 06-6356 (10th Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES CO URT O F APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT May 2, 2007 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court U N ITED STA TES O F A M ER ICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 06-6356 (W .D. Okla.) (D.C. No. CR-97-28-R) v. TED D Y LER OY BA ILEY , Defendant-Appellant. OR D ER AND JUDGM ENT * Before BR ISC OE, M cKA Y, and M cCO NNELL, Circuit Judges. Appellant Teddy Leroy Bailey filed what he styled an Independent Bill In Equity For Relief from Judgment and Action In Aequitas Et In Personam challenging his previously imposed sentence. The U nited States D istrict Court for the W estern District of Oklahoma correctly dismissed this action for want of * After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). This case is therefore submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. jurisdiction. That judgment is AFFIRM ED. Appellant s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Entered for the Court, M ichael W . M cConnell Circuit Judge -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.