United States vs. Solano-Ramos, No. 06-2153 (10th Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 27, 2007 TENTH CIRCUIT Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court U N ITED STA TES O F A M ER IC A , P l a in t i f f - A p p e ll e e , v. No. 06-2153 ( D . N e w M e x ic o ) A RTU RO SO LA N O -RA M O S, a/k/a L u i s G a r c ia , a /k / a A r t u r o S o l a n o , (D .C . N o. C R 06-453 JC ) D efendant-A ppellant. ORDER AND JUDGM ENT* B e f o r e H E N R Y , H A R T Z , a n d H O L M E S , C i r c u it J u d g e s . A r t u r o S o l a n o - R a m o s w a s c o n v ic te d o f il l e g a l r e - e n tr y a f te r h a v in g b e i n g c o n v i c te d o f a n a g g r a v a t e d f e l o n y. H e c o n t e n d s t h a t th e d i s tr ic t c o u r t violated Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(i)(3)(A ) and consequently erred w hen it e n h a n c e d h i s s e n te n c e s i x te e n - l e v e l s u n d e r 8 U . S .C . § 1 3 2 6 ( b ) ( 2 ) a n d U S S G 2 L 1 . 2 ( b ) ( 1 ) . M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s a r g u e s t h a t t h e r e w e r e h ig h l y u n u s u a l c ir c u m s t a n c e s s u r r o u n d i n g h i s u n d e r l yi n g 1 9 9 0 s t a te c o u rt c o n v ic ti o n f o r a n * T h i s o r d e r a n d ju d g m e n t i s n o t b i n d i n g p r e c e d e n t e x c e p t u n d e r t h e d o c tr i n e s o f la w o f th e c a s e , r e s j u d i c a ta a n d c o l l a te r a l e s t o p p e l. I t m a y b e c i t e d , h o w e v e r, f o r i ts p e rs u a s iv e v a lu e c o n s is te n t w ith F e d . R . A p p . P . 3 2 . 1 a n d 1 0 th C i r . R . 3 2 . 1 . a g g r a v a te d f e l o n y t h a t w a r r a n t a r e d u c e d s e n te n c e . B e c a u s e h e d id n o t b r i n g a b o n a f i d e R u l e 3 2 f a c t u a l d i s p u t e t o t h e d i s t r ic t c o u r t s a t t e n t i o n , w e a f f i r m M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s s s e n te n c e . I. FA CTU A L B AC KG RO U N D O n M arch 6, 2006, M r. A rturo Solano-R amos, pleaded guilty to a o n e - c o u n t i n f o r m a ti o n t h a t a c c u s e d h im o f b e in g a n il l e g a l a li e n w h o r e - e n te r e d th e U n i t e d S ta te s s u b s e q u e n t t o h a v in g b e e n c o n v i c te d o f a n a g g r a v a t e d f e lo n y, in v io la tio n o f 8 U .S .C . § 1 3 2 6 ( a ) ( 1 ) , ( a ) ( 2 ) , a n d ( b ) ( 2 ) . O n M a y 2 5 , 2 0 0 6 , t h e d is t r i c t c o u r t c o n d u c te d a s e n te n c in g h e a ri n g . T h e district court sentenced M r. Solano-Ramos to 77 months im prisonment. 1. The Federal Offense M r . S o la n o -R a m o s is a c itiz e n a n d n a tiv e o f th e R e p u b lic o f M e x ic o . O n M a y 3 1 , 2 0 0 5 , t h e B u r e a u o f I m m ig r a ti o n a n d C u s t o m s E n f o r c e m e n t w a s a d v i s e d t h a t M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s w a s b e i n g h e l d a t t h e B e r n a l i ll o C o u n t y M e t r o p o l i ta n D e t e n t i o n C e n t e r . M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s i d e n t i f i e d h i m s e l f w i t h a n a l ia s , b u t f i n g e r p r i n t s r e v e a l e d h i s tr u e n a m e a n d t h e f a c t h e w a s a p r e v io u s l y d e p o r t e d a g g ra v a te d f e l o n . W h e n f o u n d , M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s h a d not received the express consent of the Secretary of H omeland Security to a p p ly f o r r e a d m i s s i o n , i n v i o l a ti o n o f 8 U .S . C . § 1 3 2 6 ( a ) ( 1 ) , ( a ) ( 2 ) , a n d (b)(2) 2 . T h e S t a te C o u r t C o n v i c ti o n -2- O n June 17, 1989, M r. Solano-R amos w as w ith a friend at a bar in N ew M e x ic o . H i s f r i e n d g o t i n t o a d is p u t e w i t h t h e b a r s b o u n c e r, w h o p r o c e e d e d t o e s c o r t t h e tw o m e n o u t o f th e b a r. A s M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s d r o v e o u t o f th e p a r k i n g l o t , h i s c o h o r t , s e a te d in t h e f r o n t p a s s e n g e r s e a t, f ir e d a w e a p o n i n t o t h e b a r, k i l l i n g t h e b o u n c e r a n d in j u r i n g a n o th e r p e r s o n . T h e p r e s e n te n c e i n v e s t i g a ti v e r e p o r t ( P S R ) i n d i c a te s t h a t w i t n e s s e s s t a te d th a t M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s f ir e d s h o t s a s w e ll . A c c o rd i n g t o a n a f f id a v it s u b m i t t e d b y M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s s s t a t e c o u r t d e f e n s e c o u n s e l , th e r e w a s o n l y t e n u o u s e v id e n c e s h o w in g th a t h e r c lie n t k n e w o f h is c o m p a n io n s p la n s . A plt s Br. Att. A , at 1. The State charged M r. Solano-Ramos w ith firstd e g r e e m u rd e r, a m o n g o th e r c h a r g e s . M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s e n te r e d in t o a p le a a g r e e m e n t , i n p a r t , h e c la im e d , b e c a u s e h i s c o u n s e l f e a r e d c o m m u n i t y h o s t i l i ty a g a i n s t h i m b e c a u s e o f h i s i m m ig r a n t s t a t u s a n d b e c a u s e o f r e c e n t v i o l e n c e e r u p t i n g i n b a r s i n t h e s a m e n e i g h b o r h o o d . H i s c o u n s e l s t a te d t h a t M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s f a c e d m a n d a t o r y l if e i m p r is o n m e n t if t h e j u r y c o n v i c te d h i m o f f i rs t -d e g r e e m u r d e r . U p o n c o u n s e l s r e c o m m e n d a ti o n , M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s e n te r e d a n o - c o n te s t p l e a to c o n s p i r a c y t o c o m m i t s e c o n d -d e g r e e m u r d e r . H e r e c e i v e d a th r e e -ye a r s u s p e n d e d s e n te n c e , w a s p l a c e d o n t h r e e ye a rs p r o b a ti o n , a n d h e r e c e i v e d a re c o m m e n d a ti o n a g a in s t d e p o r t a ti o n . A f te r M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s w as released from state prison, he w as removed from the U nited States to -3- t h e R e p u b li c o f M e x ic o , b u t w a s s u b s e q u e n tl y f o u n d a n d c o n v i c te d o f il l e g a l r e e n t r y o n D e c e m b e r 6 , 1 9 9 1 , o n J u ly 1 7 , 1 9 9 3 , a n d a g a in o n A p r i l 2 , 1 9 9 9 . H e w a s s e n t e n c e d t o s i x m o n t h s , t h i rt y m o n t h s , a n d s e v e n t y m o n t h s , r e s p e c t iv e l y, f o r t h e s e o f f e n s e s . 3 . T h e P l e a H e a ri n g D u r i n g t h e p le a c o l l o q u y, t h e U n it e d S t a te s s t a te d th a t M r . S o l a n o R a m o s h a d p r e v i o u s l y b e e n c o n v i c t e d o f a n a g g r a v a t e d f e l o n y, t o w i t , c o n s p i r a c y t o c o m m i t s e c o n d -d e g r e e m u r d e r. R e c . v o l . I I I , a t 8 . W h e n th e c o u r t a s k e d if th e f a c ts s t a te d b y t h e U n i t e d S t a te s w e r e e s s e n ti a ll y w h a t o c c u rr e d in t h i s c a s e , M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s r e p li e d Y e s , s i r . I d . T h e d is t r i c t c o u r t a c c e p te d M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s s g u i l t y p l e a to t h e i n f o r m a ti o n a n d f o u n d h e w a s f u ll y c o m p e t e n t a n d c a p a b le o f . . . e n te r i n g a n in f o r m e d p le a , t h a t h e is a w a r e o f th e n a tu r e o f th e c h a r g e s a n d th e c o n s e q u e n c e s o f th e p le a a n d t h a t t h e p le a o f g u i l t y i s a k n o w i n g a n d v o l u n t a r y p l e a , s u p p o r t e d b y i n d e p e n d e n t e v id e n c e o f th e e le m e n t s o f th e o f f e n s e c h a r g e d . Id . a t 8 - 9 . 4. The PSR T h e P S R d e t e r m i n e d t h a t th e t o ta l o f f e n s e l e v e l w a s 2 1 . T h e b a s e o f f e n s e le v e l w a s 8 p u r s u a n t t o U S S G § 2 L 1 .2 ( a ) . T h e P S R r e c o m m e n d e d that sixteen levels should be added pursuant to U SSG § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A )(ii) b e c a u s e M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s h a d b e e n d e p o rt e d a f t e r a c o n v ic ti o n f o r a n -4- a g g r a v a te d f e l o n y f o r a c ri m e o f v io l e n c e ( t h e N e w M e x ic o s t a te c o n v ic ti o n f o r c o n s p i r a c y t o c o m m i t s e c o n d -d e g r e e m u r d e r ) . M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s r e c e i v e d a th r e e -l e v e l d e d u c ti o n p u r s u a n t to U S S G § 3 E 1 .1 b e c a u s e h e a c c e p t e d r e s p o n s i b i l it y f o r h i s c r i m i n a l c o n d u c t . M r. Solano-Ramos s thirteen criminal history points placed him in C r i m i n a l H i s t o r y C a te g o r y V I . B e c a u s e o f th e a g e o f th e c o n v ic ti o n , t h e P S R d i d n o t re c o m m e n d i n c r e a s i n g M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s s c r i m i n a l h i s to r y p o i n t s f o r t h e c o n s p ir a c y to c o m m it s e c o n d - d e g r e e m u r d e r c o n v ic tio n . A t o t a l o f f e n s e l e v e l o f 2 1 c o m b i n e d w it h a c r i m in a l h i s t o r y c a t e g o r y o f V I yi e l d e d a g u i d e l in e r a n g e o f 7 7 - 9 6 m o n t h s . 5 . M r . S o la n o - R a m o s s O b je c t i o n s t o th e P S R M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s f il e d o b je c ti o n s t o t h e P S R a n d a rg u e d th e u n u s u a l c ir c u m s t a n c e s o f h is p r i o r s t a te c o n v ic ti o n w a r r a n t[ e d ] a s e n te n c e l o w e r t h a n th e a d v is o r y g u i d e li n e s f o r t h e typ i c a l r e e n tr y c a s e . R e c . v o l . I , d o c . 1 7 , a t 6 . H e s a id h e h a d p l e [ d ] n o c o n te s t t o t h i s v e r y s e r i o u s c h a rg e [ o f c o n s p i r a c y t o c o m m i t s e c o n d -d e g r e e m u r d e r ] d e s p i t e th e f a c t t h a t h e h a d a l w a ys i n s i s t e d t h a t h e w a s i n n o c e n t a n d t h e i n v e s t i g a t i o n o f h i s a t t o r n e y, M s . K a r i C o n v e r s e , t u r n e d u p n o th i n g t o c o n tr a d ic t t h i s . I d . a t 5 - 6 . 6 . T h e S e n te n c in g H e a ri n g A t the sentencing hearing, M r. Solano-Ramos indicated through his c o u n s e l t h a t h e h a d re v ie w e d th e p r e s e n te n c e r e p o r t a n d th a t t h e r e w a s -5- n o t h i n g i n i t t h a t h e w i s h e d s p e c i f i c a l ly t o c a l l t o t h e c o u r t s a t te n t io n . M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s a g r e e d th a t h i s f o r m a l o b j e c ti o n s h a d b e e n r e s o lv e d a n d th a t t h e s e n te n c in g g u i d e li n e c a l c u la ti o n s w e r e c o rr e c t. T h e n , t h e f o ll o w i n g colloquy occurred among the court, defendant, and his defense counsel: T h e C o u r t : A l l r i g h t . M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s , d o yo u h a v e a n yt h i n g yo u w i s h t o s a y b e f o re I i m p o s e s e n te n c e ? The D efendant: I want to say I m sorry to be here in court. The Court: You w hat? T h e D e f e n d a n t: I m s o r r y f o r b e in g h e r e a g a i n i n t h e U n i t e d States. T h e C o u r t : Y o u h a v e a h e c k o f a c ri m i n a l r e c o rd . E v e r s i n c e yo u v e b e e n i n t h i s c o u n t r y, yo u h a v e n 't d o n e a n yt h i n g r i g h t . T h e D e f e n d a n t: I g o t b l a m e d f o r s o m e th i n g I d i d n t d o . M r . G a n d e rt [ c o u n s e l f o r d e f e n d a n t] : Y o u r H o n o r , i f I m a y a d d r e s s t h a t? . . . . I n 1 9 9 0 , a f te r b e in g i n t h e U n i t e d S t a te s f o r a l m o s t s i x t e e n ye a r s , h e p l e d n o c o n t e s t t o c o n s p i r a c y t o c o m m i t s e c o n d d e g r e e m u r d e r , w h i c h w a s a t h i r d d e g r e e f e l o n y. M r . Solano-R amos indicated to me that he was totally not guilty of that charge. R e c . v o l . I V , a t 5 - 6 ( e m p h a s i s s u p p l ie d ) . T h e c o u rt a p p li e d th e s i x t e e n -l e v e l i n c r e a s e b a s e d o n M r . S o l a n o -6- R a m o s s c o n v ic tio n f o r a c ri m e o f v io le n c e . I d . a t 1 3 - 1 4 . T h e a d v i s o r y g u i d e li n e r a n g e w a s 7 7 t o 9 6 m o n t h s , b a s e d o n a to t a l o f f e n s e le v e l o f 2 1 a n d a c r i m in a l h is to ry c a te g o ry V I . I n c o n s i d e r i n g t h e 1 8 U .S . C . § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) s e n te n c in g f a c t o r s , t h e d is t r i c t c o u r t s t a te d : W ell, as a matter of fact, I reduced the sentence from 87 months to 7 7 m o n t h s . . . . I t h o u g h t h e n e e d e d m o r e . O n e o f t h e p r o b l e m s is , t h e S t a te , w h e n th e y s e n te n c e th e m , t h e y a lw a ys p u t t h e m o n p r o b a t io n . . . . Y o u k n o w , a S t a te s e n te n c e i s e ig h t ye a rs , s e v e n ye a rs s u s p e n d e d . S o h e s i n t h e b ig l e a g u e s n o w , a n d h e g e t s t o g o to jail. And I ve considered all of those things. N o, I had to s c r a tc h o u t 8 8 a n d p u t i n 7 7 b e c a u s e I w a s g o i n g t o g i v e h im m o r e . ... H e s done nothing since he got in the U nited States except commit c r i m e s . . . . S o h e d o e s n t g e t a n y s ym p a th y f r o m m e . Id. at 16-17. The court accordingly imposed a sentence of 77 m onths i m p r i s o n m e n t. II. D ISC USSIO N M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s m a i n t a i n s t h a t t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t f a i l e d t o m e e t i ts R u l e 3 2 ( i) (3 ) ( b ) o b l ig a t io n s b e c a u s e it f a i l e d t o c l e a r ly r e s o l v e th e p a r ti e s d i s p u t e a s t o t h e c ir c u m s t a n c e s s u r r o u n d i n g M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s s p r e v io u s conviction for conspiracy to commit second-degree murder. Rule 3 2 ( i ) ( 3 ) ( b ) r e q u ir e s a s e n te n c in g c o u r t , w h e n a d e f e n d a n t p r e s e n ts a n y disputed portion of the presentence report or other controverted matter, to rule on the dispute or determ ine that a ruling is unnecessary either because -7- t h e m a t t e r w i l l n o t a f f e c t s e n te n c in g , o r b e c a u s e th e c o u rt w i l l n o t c o n s i d e r t h e m a t t e r i n s e n te n c in g . F E D . R . C R I M . P . 3 2 ( i) ( 3 ) ( B ) . M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s i n s i s t s h e is n o t c h a ll e n g in g t h e v a li d i t y o r existence of that conviction, rather he contends that the district court should have resolved the facts surrounding the conviction. He notes his u n w a v e ri n g i n s i s t e n c e u p o n h i s i n n o c e n c e ; h i s l a c k o f k n o w l e d g e in v o l v i n g h i s p a s s e n g e r w h o k i ll e d t h e b a r s b o u n c e r ; s t a te d e f e n s e c o u n s e l s explanation of her recommendation to enter the plea bargain; the state c o u r t s i m p o s i t i o n o f a le n ie n t s e n te n c e o f th r e e ye a rs p r o b a ti o n ; a n d th e s t a te c o u rt s r e c o m m e n d a ti o n a g a in s t d e p o r t a ti o n . N evertheless, w e disagree w ith M r. Solano-Ramos that he properly i n v o k e d R u l e 3 2 . A t t h e s e n te n c in g h e a ri n g , d e f e n s e c o u n s e l a c k n o w l e d g e d t h a t h i s o b je c tio n s to th e P S R h a d b e e n a d d r e s s e d . R e c . v o l. I V , a t 4 - 5 . S h o r t l y t h e r e a f t e r h o w e v e r, d e f e n s e c o u n s e l s t a te d th a t: M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s i n d i c a t e d t o m e t h a t h e w a s t o t a l l y n o t g u i l ty o f t h a t c h a r g e , a n d I t a l k e d t o h i m a b o u t t h a t c h a rg e . I d . a t 6 . C o u n s e l a r g u e d th a t t h e d e f e n s e c o u n s e l f r o m t h e s t a te c o u r t p r o c e e d i n g e s s e n t ia l ly v e r i f i e d e v e r yt h i n g t h a t M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s s ta t e d . S h e i n d i c a t e d t o m e t h a t h e p l e [ d ] n o c o n t e s t b e c a u s e s h e w a s c o n c e r n e d a b o u t l o s i n g a t t r i a l. T h e s t a k e s w e r e e x c e e d in g l y h i g h [ i. e . p o s s i b l e c o n v ic ti o n f o r f ir s t - d e g r e e m u r d e r ] . I d . a t 6 - 7 . T h e s e arguments may appropriately challenge the nature and circumstance of his -8- o f f e n s e u n d e r § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) , b u t t h e d is t r i c t c o u r t w e ig h e d th i s a r g u m e n t a t t h e s e n t e n c i n g h e a ri n g . E v e n if w e w e r e to a s s u m e th a t M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s s r e a d in g o f th e unusual circumstances of the state court offense did invoke Rule 32, this c h a ll e n g e a l s o f a il s . U n d e r R u l e 3 2 , M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s is r e q u ir e d to m a k e s p e c i f i c a l le g a t io n s o f f a c t u a l i n a c c u r a c y. U n i te d S t a t e s v . R o d r ig u e z D e l m a , 4 5 6 F . 3 d 1 2 4 6 , 1 2 5 4 ( 1 0 t h C i r . 2 0 0 6 ) ( q u o t i n g U n i t e d S ta t e s v . M u r r a y , 8 2 F .3 d 3 6 1 , 3 6 3 (1 0 th C ir .1 9 9 6 ) ) , c e r t . d e n ie d , 2 0 0 7 W L 1 3 0 1 6 9 ( F e b . 2 0 , 2 0 0 7 ) . O n c e a d e f e n d a n t ra i s e s s u c h a l le g a t io n s , t h e d i s tr ic t c o u r t m u s t p r o v id e a d e f in ite a n d c le a r r u lin g o n a d is p u te d is s u e . U n i t e d S ta t e s v . W il l i a m s , 3 7 4 F .3 d 9 4 1 , 9 4 7 n .9 ( 1 0 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . A l t h o u g h M r . S o l a n o -R a m o s t r i e s v a li a n tl y t o r e - f r a m e t h e f a c tu a l dispute otherw ise, the only fact counsel points to that may be inaccurate is M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s s c u l p a b i l it y f o r t h e u n d e r l yi n g c o n s p i r a c y t o c o m m i t second-degree murder: M r. Solano-Ramos ple[d] no contest to this very s e r i o u s c h a rg e d e s p i t e th e f a c t t h a t h e h a d a l w a ys i n s i s t e d th a t h e w a s innocent and the investigation of his attorney . . . turned up nothing to c o n t r a d i c t th is . R e c . v o l. I V , d o c . 1 7 , a t 5 - 6 . S e e U n i t e d S t a t e s v . H a r r i s , 447 F.3d 1300, 1306 (10th Cir. 2006) ( Rule 32 requires the defendant to a f f i r m a t i v e ly p o in t o u t a n y f a c t in th e P S R th a t h e c o n te n d s is in a c c u r a te . ) . -9- I n t h e e n d , h o w e v e r , t h e o n l y f a c t a t i s s u e is t h e e x i s t e n c e o f t h e s t a t e c o u r t c o n v ic ti o n , a n d M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s d o e s n o t c o n te s t t h i s f a c t f o r g o o d r e a s o n . I t is w e l l - e s t a b l i s h e d t h a t M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s m a y n o t , in t h i s p r o c e e d i n g , a tt a c k th e v a li d i t y o f h is p r e v io u s s t a te c o u rt c o n v ic ti o n . T h e S u p r e m e C o u r t h a s s t a te d e x p li c it l y t h a t o n c e a s t a te c o n v ic ti o n i s n o l o n g e r o p e n to d i r e c t o r c o ll a te r a l a tt a c k in i t s o w n r i g h t b e c a u s e th e d e f e n d a n t f a ile d to p u r s u e th o s e r e m e d i e s w h i l e th e y w e r e a v a i l a b le ( o r b e c a u s e th e d e f e n d a n t d i d s o u n s u c c e s s f u ll y) , t h e c o n v ic ti o n m a y b e r e g a rd e d a s c o n c lu s i v e ly v a li d . L a c k a w a n n a C o u n t y D i s t. A t t y v . C o s s , 5 3 2 U . S . 3 9 4 , 4 0 3 - 0 4 ( 2 0 0 1 ) ; s e e U n i t e d S t a t e s v . D e l a c r u z - S o t o , 4 1 4 F .3 d 1 1 5 8 , 1 1 6 5 ( 1 0 t h C i r . 2 0 0 5 ) ( a p p lyi n g L a c k a w a n n a i n a d i re c t a p p e a l ). M o r e o v e r , t h e l i m i t e d e x c e p tio n s to th is ru le a r e in a p p lic a b le h e r e . L a c k a w a n n a , 5 3 2 U . S . a t 4 0 5 -0 6 . W e h o ld t h a t M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s h a s n o t m a [ d e ] a n y a ll e g a ti o n s o f f a c t u a l i n a c c u r a c y [ a n d th u s ] t h e d is t r i c t c o u r t s f a c t - f in d i n g o b l i g a ti o n u n d e r R u l e 3 2 ( i ) ( 3 ) ( B ) w a s n e v e r t r i g g e r e d . R o d r i g u e z - D e lm a , a t 1 2 5 4 . III. C ON CLU SIO N A c c o rd i n g l y, w e A F F I R M M r . S o l a n o - R a m o s s s e n te n c e . Entered for the Court, Robert H. Henry C ir c u it J u d g e -10-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.